bilekas 18 hours ago

> They confirmed that they will not be able to support adult content that fits the following definition: “content designed for sexual gratification.

I'm sorry but when a payment processor has pretty much become critical infrastructure, at what point are they legally required to process legal payments ?

Is there no regulations surrounding the big two, Visa & Mastercard that ensure they're not exercising excessive control over legal content?

  • lotsofpulp 14 hours ago

    That is the whole point of the federal government not offering electronic payments and money accounts as infrastructure. The leaders get to use businesses to selectively target whoever or whichever populations whenever they want, with no legal recourse. Same with electronic identification.

jajuuka 12 hours ago

I'll give them props for coming up with a creative solution to get around this instead of just giving up.

elpocko 17 hours ago

Sexual gratification makes you feel good, we can't support that - think of the children. But we'll happily continue to process payments for torture and murder simulators.

Insanity.

  • conartist6 16 hours ago

    [flagged]

    • dlachausse 15 hours ago

      The organization behind this, Collective Shout, is Australian, not American.

      https://www.collectiveshout.org/

      Also, funny you bring up guns. The payment processors caused issues for legal gun, ammunition, and accessories purchases before the current NSFW content issue. It's such a problem that firearm friendly credit card processing companies are a thing now.

      https://www.tacticalpay.com/